Following yet another mass slaughter in the US—this time inside a church in Texas, where former-US military “member” Devin Patrick Kelley opened fire killing 26 people—including an 18-month-old baby girl—US President Donald Trump—in a fit of moral outrage and genuine concern for the victims—has declared a new “war on terror”.
This war on terror, Trump announced during his state visit to Japan, was going to be aimed at “all white guys” as they are ones “doing all the terrorism.”
Trump, repeating what he said during his campaign for office, about Islamic terrorists said that he was “going to bomb the hell out of them and their families”.
Of course, no such thing has happened….
As is the standard practice at this point, the recent massacre in Texas is being labeled and presented by politicians and the media as a “lone gun man-good guy gone bad-mental illness is the cause” narrative.
This is despite the fact that white males are now considered to be a greater threat in the US than Islamic terrorists and they have also carried out more attacks than Islamic terrorists, and have killed roughly the same amount of people in these attacks.
The US government is well aware of the terrorist threat posed by white males, on 27th September, just 5 days before the Vegas killer went on a rampage slaughtering at least 58, and injuring at least 527 people, Democratic Senator, Claire McCaskill and FBI Director, Christoper Wray discussed the burgeoning problem at a Senate hearing in Washington.
During the hearing, they discussed the clear, relative lack of attention paid to the threat posed by white terrorists when compared to Islamic based terror.
McCaskill referenced a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) that showed white supremacist and other anti-government extremists have carried out 62 terrorist attacks resulting in 106 fatalities since 9/11.
In the same time radical Muslims had executed just 23—killing 119 people, the report stated.
McCaskill said at the hearing that:
I don’t think most Americans realize that the number of incidents by white supremacist militant [and] anti-government organizations are almost triple the number of attacks of those who identify with a jihadist movement internationally in this country,
This issue is therefore nothing new—and security experts are well aware of the clear terrorist threat posed by white males.
The GAO report indicated that white shooters are on the FBI’s terrorist list, therefore, indicating that the US Gov itself, does, in fact, consider these acts to be terrorism.
The standard, accepted definition of terrorism is expressed here by the UN, who in 2004 defined it as:
criminal acts, including against civilians, committed with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or taking of hostages, with the purpose to provoke a state of terror in the general public or in a group of persons or particular persons, intimidate a population or compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act, which constitute offences within the scope of and as defined in the international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism, are under no circumstances justifiable by considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or other similar nature.
There are also indications that religion may have played a key role in motivation Kelley’s attack—The Independent reports that:
Kelley was married and it is believed he has taught a Bible studies at Kingsville First Baptist Church.
This combined with the scene of the attack: a church, heavily imply some sort of religious motivation.
The fact Kelley was in the US armed forces adding weight to the terrorism charge—maybe he was enraged at his treatment by the government?
The truth is: we will likely never know: because that would require actual journalism and the asking of difficult questions—and we can’t have that now, can we?
So then it seems appropriate given these definitions, that we should conclude that indeed white males are a category to be targeted by the state as terrorists.
So, let’s apply the principles of the war on Islamic terror lead by the West, to combatting the terror threat posed by white males.
The first thing we should do, of course, is one the first things that former US President, George W Bush did following the aftermath of 9/11: and declare a “war on terror” on white men in the US and beyond.
The next thing Trump should do, being the current US President as he is, is to deploy thousands of troops to any states in which there has been white guy terrorism or where white guy terrorism could happen—the likely breeding grounds.
The troops should then proceed to capture, torture, rape and kill anybody they deem to be terrorists, or possibly related to terrorists, or who one day may become terrorists.
Torture will not only have to be implemented, it will have to be increased, as Trump said of torturing Islamic terrorists:
We have to play the game the way they’re playing the game. You’re not going to win if we’re soft and they’re, they have no rules.
we have to beat the savages
Waterboarding—we should imagine—will be the least of the torture, as Trump has firmly stated before that we must go much further than this, because:
I think we’ve become very weak and ineffective. I think that’s why we’re not beating ISIS. It’s that mentality
Some of the white males should be sent to a new white guy Guantanamo Bay, where they will be held without evidence for years at a time, and subject to torture—including sexual torture—without any due legal process or rights—demanding that they hand over their leaders, and tell us everything they know about other white male terrorists.
The next thing Trump should do is start a mass bombing campaign against the terror states—the campaign must be indiscriminate, killing men, women, and children.
Trump should particularly focus on mass gatherings of white males; football stadiums, pubs, and bars, and of course churches, all being prime breeding grounds for possible white male radicalization and terror.
He would have to start with Las Vegas in Nevada (not his own Casino there though, of course) and move to Texas following this latest attack.
Just as Trump said of Iran and the mid east countries we have to “knock the hell out of them” and then “take the oil” from the rich oil-terror containing states such as Texas, California, Oklahoma, and Louisiana, and reap billions in profits from the white males who own the refineries (probably all terrorists).
Although this would defy both international and domestic law—Trump should proceed with his war on white male terrorism anway—fuck the law, right?
Trump should make sure to use white phosphorous and depleted uranium to achieve the full desired effects of his war on white terrorism: the results being mass genetic deformities as seen here when the US used them in Iraq.
The next thing Trump needs to do is start a mass assassination campaign against white men—taking out as he said of Islamic terrorists both them and thier families:
The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families, when you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families. They care about their lives, don’t kid yourself. When they say they don’t care about their lives, you have to take out their families.
Using Obama’s favorite killing toy: drones.
While all this is going on Trump and his corporate fat cat pals should help themselves to the land, assets and anything else of worth that the possible white male terrorists possess.
At this point white guy terror is likely to have all but been stopped completely—however, there may still be the odd attack here and there—so he’ll have to go further. While terror experts are pretty much in universal agreement that the Islamic war on terror has created far more terrorism—Trump’s war on white male terrorism will no doubt deal with the problem effectively, and with little negative consequence for innocent people..
Next, Trump will have to deport the white males back—a “white male ban”, if you will—to where they came from (mainly Europe, starting about 400 years ago), and stop any further white males from entering the US: this extends to women giving birth to white male children.
These babies will either have to be destroyed, deported, or kept in detention centers till they can prove they aren’t terrorists. Border patrols will need to be increased to make sure that suspect white males are prevented from re-entering the states—a wall would have to be erected along the entire border of the country to ensure that white males are kept out.
Then Trump will have to start a drone campaign against the white males in countries with other white males all over Europe: the source of the terror in the first place.
Drone strikes against white males in the UK, Ireland, Poland, anywhere in which the evil white male can be found—as Trump has said before the drone strikes also need to take out their families, and children: that’s just how you fight terrorism.
Trump will also have to identify the sources of white male terror radicalization itself: this ranges from anywhere on the internet where white men might frequent (which would have to be heavily monitered and censored by the state) to video games, to comic books forums: all potential sources of indoctrination and radicalization.
And let us not forget the link here between white males and Christianity: no doubt, the evil verses found in the Bible, such as this:
And Moses was wroth with the officers … And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? … Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves—Numbers 31:1-18
And the LORD our God delivered him before us; and we smote him, and his sons, and all his people. And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city, we left none to remain: Deuteronomy 2:33-34
And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them. Deuteronomy 7:2, 7:16″
If thou shalt hear say … Certain men … saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known … Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword. Deuteronomy 13:12-15
When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it … And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword: But the women … shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee. … But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth: But thou shalt utterly destroy them … as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee. Deuteronomy 20:10-17
And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword. Joshua 6:21
So Joshua smote all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of the vale, and of the springs, and all their kings: he left none remaining, but utterly destroyed all that breathed, as the LORD God of Israel commanded. Joshua 10:40
Will need to be frequently condemmed by him.
And prominent media figures who spread the angry white guy ideology, such Fox News’ Bill O’Reily, and Infowar’s Paul Joseph Watson, will also have to be censored and banned.
These are all dangerous radicalisation sources and indoctrination of the evil white male—the Bible, of course, being a core source of much of the evil and barbarity: but what more should we expect from the backward white males? They can’t handle such radical texts without potentially becoming terrorists—such is their inferior culture.
The media, of course, will also have to do their best to inform the public about the dire threat posed by white males. Screaming and emotive headlines about the destruction they cause and the terror they inflict and the fact they want to destroy “our way of life” with their backward culture and caveman like ways will, no doubt, be commonplace.
Just like the war on Islamic terror this too will be a costly venture for the US Pres—the middle east wars have cost the US taxpayer at least 4.8 trillion dollars —before interest is even taken into account—a price worth paying to keep us safe though…
We should expect at least 1 million (mainly white) people to be killed—as is the case in the war on Islamic terror—doesn’t matter though as even if they weren’t terrorists, they probably would’ve become terrorists at some point.
The group’s leaders will also have to be targeted: this is where things might start to get a bit tricky for the US President.
After all, he is the ultimate angry white guy, who likes to go around threatening people and inciting violence….
It cannot be a coincidence that the number of terrorist attacks carried out by white guys has increased since Trump came into office.
He is likely to have been the source of inspiration for them—almost like a white guy Osama Bin-laden.
Trump then, will ultimately have to declare a war on terror on himself.
I think we should leave this particular thought experiment there for now.
The point is that terrorism needs to be understood rather than just shouted at and that the motivations of terrorists span across various ideologies, and happen for various reasons.
Islamic terrorism is in part motivated by radical Islam, but as Osama Bin-laden made clear in his letter to the West—the drivers behind Islamic terror, involves reasons that go far beyond radical Islam: including the West’s unflinching support for the most brutal dictators in the Islamic world, the constant crushing of human rights and democratic movements, the Western-backed, trained, armed and funded overthrow of democratically elected leaders, stealing of natural resources such as oil from the middle east, and Western military aggression and occupation: as well as support and funding for the Isreali atrocities in Palestine.
This aside from the fact the West has always supported and continues to support the Saudi terror state: the source responsible for spreading the most extreme and brutal Wahhabi-Salafi interpretation of Islam across the world: the state that imprisons, and tortures and executes anybody who is campaigning for even the most basic of democratic and human rights.
The reasons for the current speight of white terror in the US—often aimed at government, or in the case of the Vegas killer, potentially the capitalist system itself—after all, casinos and gambling represent the most disgusting elements of unfettered greed and destruction of humanity—as players are gambling all they have against a corrupt system….a system that can, and often does break them, and destroys lives and families.
The reasons may also have something to do with the vast wealth and income inequalities that have become commonplace since the inception of the neoliberal period: jobs exported abroad, wages in steady decline, jobs less secure than ever, manufacturing jobs that once provided security and pride now gone: leaving many places, people, and communities decimated.
These are just some of the reasons—the root causes of terrorism and crime in general.
The narrative developed around the white lone guman—good kid gone bad—mental illness sufferer—may well all be true, but they are also likely to be true of Islamic terror.
Whether or not they are true is not so much the point: the point is to understand the root cause—and understand that atrocity is not somehow better or worse when carried out by ISIS or a white terrorist.
The justification used for the war on terror in the Islamic world could be applied to a similar kind of campaign against the white male terrorists—but to even suggest so would be absurd.
People would rightly laugh at you for even suggesting what I have above.
Yet, the war on terror in the Islamic world was not laughed at by the West, it was treated as if it was inevitable, and fed to us as if it was the only solution.
In the same way, we did not go around during the height of the IRA attacks declaring that anybody with a Northern Irish accent could be a terrorist, we should also accept that just because somebody is Muslim it does not, by default, make then a possible suspect.
What makes people terrorists—the drivers behind terrorism that is—that’s what we need to look at here.
I don’t wish to single the US out here for the double standards imposed on terror—we have the same issue: a quick glance at the Global Terror Database reveals that white male terrorism is more prevalent than Islamic terror in the UK. Much of our white male terrorism is directed at Muslims themselves—it really is quite shocking to read through the data, you quickly realize just how many Mosques have been burned down, Muslims stabbed outside them, etc—most of which barely receives an inch of media attention.
There is a blueprint right in front of our eyes for dealing with terrorism—the Northern Ireland peace agreement is a testament to the fact that terrorism can only really be dealt with through diplomacy, negotiation and understanding of the root causes.
Until we do that, we can expect more racism, more Islamophobia, and more and more terrorism: whether carried out by white males, radical Islamists, or anybody else for that matter.